Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Reading Behavior: Fact or Artifcat Wayne Otto

Does reading fiction make us meliorate people?

(Credit: Getty Images)

Reading fiction has been said to increment people's empathy and pity. But does the research really bear that out?

Textual Healing is a season that explores the benefits of reading for mental wellness. Await out for stories on BBC Culture, BBC Reel and BBC Future and join BBC Civilization's Facebook group Textual Healing for more.

Every day more than than one.8 million books are sold in the Usa and another half a million books are sold in the U.k.. Despite all the other easy distractions available to usa today, there's no dubiety that many people all the same honey reading. Books tin teach u.s.a. enough well-nigh the globe, of course, also as improving our vocabularies and writing skills. But can fiction also brand us better people?

The claims for fiction are great. It's been credited with everything from an increase in volunteering and charitable giving to the tendency to vote – and fifty-fifty with the gradual decrease in violence over the centuries.

Characters hook u.s. into stories. Aristotle said that when we picket a tragedy two emotions predominate: pity (for the character) and fright (for yourself). Without necessarily even noticing, we imagine what it'due south like to exist them and compare their reactions to situations with how we responded in the past, or imagine nosotros might in the future.

You lot might too like:
• Can reading improve your mental wellness?
• How feeling bad changes the encephalon
• The astonishing benefits of beingness bilingual

This exercise in perspective-taking is like a training course in agreement others. The Canadian cognitive psychologist Keith Oatley calls fiction "the mind'due south flight simulator". Just as pilots can practise flying without leaving the footing, people who read fiction may meliorate their social skills each time they open a novel. In his enquiry, he has found that as nosotros begin to place with the characters, we offset to consider their goals and desires instead of our own. When they are in danger, our hearts start to race. We might even gasp. But we read with luxury of knowing that none of this is happening to united states. We don't moisture ourselves with terror or spring out of windows to escape.

Fiction has been called "the mind's flight simulator" (Credit: Getty Images)

Fiction has been chosen "the heed'south flight simulator" (Credit: Getty Images)

Having said that, some of the neural mechanisms the encephalon uses to make sense of narratives in stories practise share similarities with those used in existent-life situations. If we read the word "kick", for example, areas of the encephalon related to physically kicking are activated. If we read that a character pulled a calorie-free string, activeness increases in the region of the brain associated with grasping.

To follow a plot, we need to know who knows what, how they feel about it and what each grapheme believes others might be thinking. This requires the skill known as "theory of listen". When people read about a character's thoughts, areas of the encephalon associated with theory of mind are activated.

When people read about a character's thoughts, areas of the brain associated with theory of mind are activated (Credit: Getty Images)

When people read nigh a character'southward thoughts, areas of the encephalon associated with theory of mind are activated (Credit: Getty Images)

With all this practise in empathising with other people through reading, you would recollect it would be possible to demonstrate that those who read fiction accept better social skills than those who read mostly not-fiction or don't read at all.

The difficulty with conducting this kind of research is that many of united states of america have a tendency to exaggerate the number of books we've read. To get around this, Oatley and colleagues gave students a list of fiction and non-fiction writers and asked them to indicate which writers they had heard of. They warned them that a few fake names had been thrown in to check they weren't lying. The number of writers people have heard of turns out to exist a expert proxy for how much they actually read.

Many of us tend to exaggerate the number of books we've read (Credit: Getty Images)

Many of usa tend to exaggerate the number of books we've read (Credit: Getty Images)

Next, Oatley'due south team gave people the "Mind in the Eyes" test, where yous are given a serial of photographs of pairs of eyes. From the eyes and surrounding skin lonely, your job is to divine which emotion a person is feeling. Yous are given a curt list of options similar shy, guilty, heedless or worried. The expressions are subtle and at start glance might appear neutral, then it'due south harder than it sounds. But those accounted to accept read more fiction than non-fiction scored higher on this test – besides as on a scale measuring interpersonal sensitivity.

At the Princeton Social Neuroscience Lab, psychologist Diana Tamir has demonstrated that people who often read fiction accept meliorate social cognition. In other words, they're more skilled at working out what other people are thinking and feeling. Using encephalon scans, she has plant that while reading fiction, at that place is more activity in parts of the default mode network of the encephalon that are involved in simulating what other people are thinking.

People who often read fiction have greater social cognition (Credit: Getty Images)

People who oft read fiction have greater social cognition (Credit: Getty Images)

People who read novels appear to exist better than average at reading other people's emotions, but does that necessarily make them better people? To test this, researchers at used a method many a psychology student has tried at some betoken, where you "accidentally" drib a bunch of pens on the floor and then see who offers to assist you assemble them up. Before the pen-driblet took place participants were given a mood questionnaire interspersed with questions measuring empathy. So they read a short story and answered a series of questions near to the extent they had felt transported while reading the story. Did they have a vivid mental pic of the characters? Did they desire to acquire more than most the characters after they'd finished the story?

The experimenters then said they needed to fetch something from another room and, oops, dropped vi pens on the way out. It worked: the people who felt the most transported by the story and expressed the nearly empathy for the characters were more likely to aid retrieve the pens.

You might be wondering whether the people who cared the almost about the characters in the story were the kinder people in the first place – as in, the type of people who would offer to assist others. But the authors of the study took into account people's scores for empathy and establish that, regardless, those who were most transported by the story behaved more altruistically.

In one experiment, people who felt most transported by a story later behaved more altruistically (Credit: Getty Images)

In one experiment, people who felt nearly transported past a story later behaved more altruistically (Credit: Getty Images)

Of class, experiments are one thing. Before we extrapolate to wider society we demand to be careful well-nigh the management of causality. At that place is always the possibility that in real life, people who are more than empathic in the first identify are more than interested in other people's interior lives and that this interest draws them towards reading fiction. It's non an easy topic to research: the ideal study would involving measuring people's empathy levels, randomly allocating them either to read numerous novels or none at all for many years, and and then measuring their empathy levels again to see whether reading novels had made any divergence.

Instead, short-term studies have been done. For example, Dutch researchers arranged for students to read either newspaper manufactures about riots in Greece and liberation day in the netherlands or the outset chapter from Nobel Prize winner Jose Saramago'south novel Incomprehension. In this story, a man is waiting in his machine at traffic lights when he all of a sudden goes blind. His passengers bring him home and a passer-by promises to drive his auto home for him, but instead he steals it. When students read the story, not simply did their empathy levels rise immediately after, but provided they had felt emotionally transported by the story, a week subsequently they scored even higher on empathy than they did correct after reading.

Of form, you could argue that fiction isn't alone in this. We can understand with people we see in news stories also, and hopefully we often do. But fiction has at least iii advantages. We take access to the graphic symbol's interior world in a way we unremarkably practice not with journalism, and nosotros are more likely to willingly suspend disbelief without questioning the veracity of what people are proverb. Finally, novels allow the states to exercise something that is hard to exercise in our own lives, which is to view a character'due south life over many years.

Some institutions consider reading to be so significant that they include modules on literature (Credit: Getty Images)

Some institutions consider reading to be so meaning that they include modules on literature (Credit: Getty Images)

And then the research shows that mayhap reading fiction does make people bear better. Certainly some institutions consider the furnishings of reading to exist and then meaning that they now include modules on literature. At the Academy of California Irvine, for example, Johanna Shapiro from the Department of Family Medicine firmly believes that reading fiction results in better doctors and has led the institution of a humanities plan to train medical students.

It sounds as though it's time to lose the stereotype of the shy bookworm whose nose is always in a book because they detect information technology difficult to deal with existent people. In fact, these bookworms might be better than everyone else at agreement human being beings.

Textual Healingis a season that explores the benefits of reading for mental health. Wait out for stories on BBC Culture, BBC Reel and BBC Future and join BBC Civilisation's Facebook group Textual Healingfor more.

Join more than 1 million Time to come fans by liking u.s.a. on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter  or Instagram .

If y'all liked this story, sign upward for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "If You Only Read six Things This Week". A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Civilization, Capital, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

Reading Behavior: Fact or Artifcat Wayne Otto

Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190523-does-reading-fiction-make-us-better-people